Facepalm
No, this isn’t a math lesson (I suck at math).
This is a lesson in frustration, jaded cynicism and catching
myself doing something I always said I wouldn’t do in my profession.
It happened about a year and a half ago. I was just starting
a new position with a fairly well known, international company. I was
rediscovering my passion for safety in a way that only someone new to an
operation can. The process was new (to me anyway) and exciting. The political
atmosphere was new, the players were new – and yet familiar in a good way. It
was refreshing to be back in a “stable” manufacturing environment after so many
years in Research and Development.
Some of the challenges, however, were not new. “That will
slow us down…”, “That’s been broken for years…” and “It’s common sense!” – are
all, to anyone who’s been in the EHS world (for more than a week anyway),
common phrases and discussions heard from employees. I have heard these
everywhere I’ve worked. I’ve heard these comments from my relatives and my high
school buddies about their places of employment. We all develop our little
canned statements and platitudes to deflect or explain these. Life – and safety
– goes on…
So, like any grizzled EHS Professional with years of
“experience” under his belt, I was fully prepared to rebuke any attempt at
argument from the maintenance supervisor during our machine guarding
inspection.
It was like a well-rehearsed sparring exhibition – comment
and counter-comment, a discussion I had all but memorized:
Me: “There is an access hole on that machine that
needs to be covered.”
Him: “That’s crazy, it’s a 2-inch hole for
lubricating the gears.”
Me: “…and 2-inches is big enough for someone to
put their finger in it and get bit.”
Him: “You would have to work really hard to get at it where it’s at and you
can see that it has moving gears in it! You’d have to be an idiot to put your
finger in there!”
…and then I heard myself say something that that left his,
and my, jaws hanging open:
“You’re right, but somebody will find a way to do it. Safety is about managing
the lowest common denominator…”
Soul Searching
Uttering that phrase was what started a long, scrutinizing
look at where my attitude had drifted over the last several years in regard to
my chosen career path.
I have always thought of myself as a “think and choose” EHS
professional, as opposed to a “cause I said so” type. Meaning, I would rather
spend an hour, or 2 hours, talking to someone about an issue and explaining it
until they completely understand the “Why?” behind the “What?” of what I’m
asking them to do. My motto for the first several years was - “Train ‘em ‘til
they PUKE!” – which was my abrasive, uncouth way of saying “Keep explaining it
until you see the light of understanding go on in their eyes.”
Very rarely have I taken the attitude of “because I said so”
and NEVER have I taken the attitude that my job exists because people are
stupid.
But there it was – a comment that revealed where my brain
was at. After 8+ years of passionately attempting to educate employees on the
reasons behind what I do, I had just equated my entire career to putting the
whole school in diapers because one kid peed his pants in class.
When did this cynicism creep into my way of thinking? When
did my passion for doing the right thing give way to the pragmatism of doing
what was easy?
While soul-searching for these answers to my personal
dilemma, I began rereading old policies, procedures and training material that
I had written, (I keep everything on a hard drive for reference). While
spooling through these old presentations and procedures, I marveled at the
difference between what I presented and wrote in my early years vs. projects
later in my career. I had definitely grown in knowledge, experience and
technical writing skills over the years – some of my old stuff out of college
was almost cartoony.
I also noticed a definite growing jaded side to my material
as it progressed. Presentations became less about keeping people interested and
more about reciting rules and worst-cast scenarios. Policies and procedures
went from general statements of intent to pages of detailed documents that
would make a lawyer cringe as I attempted to close every possible loophole and
account for every possible situation. Once I noticed the pattern, I began matching
old email conversations to the time frames of the material and made a shocking
discovery…
As my cynicism got worse, I had more difficulty getting what
I wanted done in my facility. What a cycle to be stuck in!
Realization
I never did find a definitive starting point, but the whole
situation did get me thinking about how we, as Safety Professionals, manage our
processes. I and many others, I’m sure, get caught in the trap of issuing
blanket statements and rules without regard to how those rules are being perceived
by the people whom they are affecting. Procedures intended to prevent injuries,
metamorphose into procedures that punish everyone in order to make managing the
process easier.
And don’t kid yourself – employees DO look at it as a
punishment…
Think about your facility – hearing conservation, for
example – do you require everyone on the shop floor to wear earplugs at all
times? Are all of those employees exposed to a 90dB TWA, or do you make
everyone wear them to make it easier to enforce?
Do your policies make sense? I know, regulations sometimes
require procedures that don’t seem to make sense to your operation, but are you
tailoring those ones that are performance standards to meet the regulation
without placing an undue burden on your employees?
I was talking to an
employee of another company a few years back who had just been issued a hard
hat and told it was mandatory to wear it in the shop. He told me that the
Corporate policy was, if there was ever a recordable head injury at the
location, hard hats would become mandatory in the shop (apparently the company
had not done risk assessments to see if they were needed before they had an
injury). A few months later, a recordable head injury requiring stitches
happened, prompting implementation of the mandatory policy in the shop (wait
for it).
The injury occurred in the office when an administrative
assistant pulled a box of paper off a high shelf and it struck and lacerated her
forehead. Guess who wasn’t affected by the new mandatory hard hat policy…?
Take a Look at YOU
We as professionals need to take a good, hard look at how we
are managing our processes. Are we managing individual risk or are we taking
the easy way out.
Do some soul-searching along the way too and ask yourself if
your cynicism is interfering with your career and your passion for your chosen
life-path. If you’re frustrated with lack of participation and support,
constant second-guessing of your decisions, people falling asleep during
training, badgering by your management team, questioning by your employees over
feasibility of safety processes or just generally feel like you are protecting
people in spite of themselves – remember, the one common element in all of
these problems, the lowest common denominator, might be you.
Be Safe my Fellows.
No comments:
Post a Comment